ᗩᖇᗰY oƒ ᗩﬡᘐᗴᒪᔕ|AGE 3

[neoexdeath]

Front page edited!
Changes:
~ Angel AGE History. (Located on my 3rd post on the thread down)

Thanks for taking the time to read it; if you did.

I didn't but I will (only if there is no "angels take over everything +stupid reason")

[Ryankill]

It's biased and I find it a bit offensive.

i agree, and tannenbaums is the thing he blames, but the thing i dont understand is half the games for the war he made but he left boosts on?

[>(FM)<]

It's biased and I find it a bit offensive.

Biased?
Yes, its very biased since it's about MY clans history.
Oh, yes i just read over it.
About the offensive part i was just being truthful at the time you didn't read the forums very much and thats what i said, not my fault your offensive of the truth.


But, was the Angels Threw The Ages post not interesting?
Did it not make you want to keep reading?
Of course not no one says anything helpful around here.

[>(FM)<]

The Military Soldiers Leader recruited a experienced WolfPack member to lead the clan. The WolfPack member; Ryankill soon turned the clan from a group of noobs into a force to be reckoned with.

Yeah, Ryankill, skip right over the complament i give you and investigate to find even the smallest thing that questions your strength.
And sure keep spamming me with PM's of threats to my clan, just stop trying to scare me out of the clan war because,... it's not working.
And the sad part is, i think YOU'RE scared.

[Autumnwolf17]

That was fun to read... It's both impressive and slightly awkward. So much bias, and a bit of truth manipulation... But that's alright, it's still nice.

[>(FM)<]

That was fun to read... It's both impressive and slightly awkward. So much bias, and a bit of truth manipulation... But that's alright, it's still nice.

I tried to keep my writing in the way i felt at the time, not now is that whats biased i still don't get why everyone says it's so biased?
Reason: Help people understand the Angel Clans history
Intentional audience: Clan members

[chris1726354]

It was fun to read but it was based off of your opinion as much as it was based off of what happened. btw I know I was a forum noob back then. That's not what I was talking about. (not trying to pick a fight, just stating my opinion.)

[>(FM)<]

It was fun to read but it was based off of your opinion as much as it was based off of what happened. btw I know I was a forum noob back then. That's not what I was talking about. (not trying to pick a fight, just stating my opinion.)

Thats exactly what i was trying to do.
Who else's opinion am i going to base it off of? lol

[chris1726354]

No-ones. it could be based off of purely fact.

[Ratburntro44]

Seems mostly accurate to me.