EFFACÉ
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Re: RAGEQUITTERS
by AxemBlue » Fri Jul 06, 2012 6:06 pm
Practically everyone I've ever played a game with, it's common practice.
I only surrender when I have no chance of beating someone else; staying around longer is just as bad as ragequitting IMAO.
I only surrender when I have no chance of beating someone else; staying around longer is just as bad as ragequitting IMAO.
Why am I still skulking around here? That's a very good question.
“the great man is he who in the midst of the crowd keeps with perfect sweetness the independence of solitude.”
― Ralph Waldo Emerson, Self-Reliance
“the great man is he who in the midst of the crowd keeps with perfect sweetness the independence of solitude.”
― Ralph Waldo Emerson, Self-Reliance
-
AxemBlue - Posts: 233
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2011 2:01 am
- Location: Limbo
Re: RAGEQUITTERS
by Vortex_Master » Fri Jul 06, 2012 6:11 pm
Too many to name.
Almost all of us have at one point.
Almost all of us have at one point.
Make Vortex Wars Great Again!
-
Vortex_Master - Posts: 5036
- Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2012 11:06 pm
Re: RAGEQUITTERS
by Xtermy » Fri Jul 06, 2012 6:14 pm
I haven't ragequitted even once in this particular game - true story.
- Xtermy
- Posts: 798
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2011 2:34 pm
Re: RAGEQUITTERS
by Joriom » Thu Jul 12, 2012 8:24 am
AxemBlue wrote:I only surrender when I have no chance of beating someone else; staying around longer is just as bad as ragequitting IMAO.
Ragequitting is TERRIBLE practice. Why? You get shards only for taking regions by force from enemy. You also get exp that way.
If you loose most of your troops due to enemy attack and all you have left are many unoccupied regions - you've probably just lost the game. Yet, if you leave now you will disallow your opponent from taking shards/exp that he deserves after defeating your main forces.
-
Joriom - Posts: 394
- Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2011 9:18 am
- Location: Under Lopdos bed
Re: RAGEQUITTERS
by Xtermy » Fri Jul 13, 2012 6:34 pm
Joriom wrote: Ragequitting is TERRIBLE practice. Why? You get shards only for taking regions by force from enemy. You also get exp that way.
If you loose most of your troops due to enemy attack and all you have left are many unoccupied regions - you've probably just lost the game. Yet, if you leave now you will disallow your opponent from taking shards/exp that he deserves after defeating your main forces.
+1
- Xtermy
- Posts: 798
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2011 2:34 pm
Re: RAGEQUITTERS
by NOVAGGG » Sat Jul 14, 2012 10:34 am
Joriom wrote:AxemBlue wrote:I only surrender when I have no chance of beating someone else; staying around longer is just as bad as ragequitting IMAO.
Ragequitting is TERRIBLE practice. Why? You get shards only for taking regions by force from enemy. You also get exp that way.
If you loose most of your troops due to enemy attack and all you have left are many unoccupied regions - you've probably just lost the game. Yet, if you leave now you will disallow your opponent from taking shards/exp that he deserves after defeating your main forces.
False...
"by Lopdo » Thu Jul 12, 2012 7:07 pm
you get the xp for every remaining territory same way as if you conquered them all"
- NOVAGGG
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2012 12:28 pm
Re: RAGEQUITTERS
by Ratburntro44 » Sat Jul 14, 2012 1:28 pm
Did he say anything about shards there?
And besides, more territory swaps will usually happen, so you actually get more xp/shards from those. Plus it adds more turns, so it raises the caps on them and gets you more if you're above the caps.
And besides, more territory swaps will usually happen, so you actually get more xp/shards from those. Plus it adds more turns, so it raises the caps on them and gets you more if you're above the caps.
-
Ratburntro44 - Posts: 5928
- Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2011 1:23 am
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests