Reviving Vortex Wars.

[techgump]

huh?

[rrrttttt]

Do you have some prejudice towards the Internet?

No, just people on the internet give me much more useless advices so i have a separate book for them elohel

people that play a specific game more typically have a clear advantage with skill/knowledge

do not mix game rules and skill please, do you admit this game has unfair rules or not?

. You did ignore that statement while commenting on the others

I consider that statement rude so i decided not to answer to it to keep this from turning to a flame war.

[ace199212]

Do you have some prejudice towards the Internet?

No, just people on the internet give me much more useless advices so i have a separate book for them elohel

people that play a specific game more typically have a clear advantage with skill/knowledge

do not mix game rules and skill please, do you admit this game has unfair rules or not?

. You did ignore that statement while commenting on the others

I consider that statement rude so i decided not to answer to it to keep this from turning to a flame war.

n00b?

[Ozserf]

EFFACÉ

[BlueSpartan2]

How does allowing people to vote on having alliances capable in a game
to clarify that means that when everybody is waiting for the game to fill before it begins besides the ready button and the race switcher they can choose another button labeled Diplomacy. If a majority votes to allow then the game will allow alliances and cease-fires and maybe even territory switching or if the majority vote against it then it will not be allowed in that game. Just another idea to make the game interesting, and can be used to make map specific to alliances and will bring in people who enjoy playing as a team with others, and can allow someone to be a "teacher" to a new player and ally with them so they can safely show them the ropes
Another idea is private chatting in game. This has obvious uses.

Lastly one other idea would be a race based rank up system thta had minor benefits for example the reptiles when first bought would have a 5% spawn boost and a 2% defence boost and then would have 2 or 3 or maybe even 4 stages where as you played them they became more powerful all the way up to their traditional boost of 10% spawn boost and 5% defence boost or you could even have the boost at teh final stage be even greater than its traditional boost.

Just got another idea!! A directory that had something explaining the game. Not a tutorial but a info packet. Such as what all race boosts are such as legionaire 2% boost, and other such things. My final idea is a personal one to switch natives from their 1 being 2 thing to being a sort of defencive terminator so that if they had a smaller army they got maybe a 10% boost cause 15% might be a bit overpowering.

[Awesome400]

How does allowing people to vote on having alliances capable in a game
to clarify that means that when everybody is waiting for the game to fill before it begins besides the ready button and the race switcher they can choose another button labeled Diplomacy. If a majority votes to allow then the game will allow alliances and cease-fires and maybe even territory switching or if the majority vote against it then it will not be allowed in that game. Just another idea to make the game interesting, and can be used to make map specific to alliances and will bring in people who enjoy playing as a team with others, and can allow someone to be a "teacher" to a new player and ally with them so they can safely show them the ropes
Another idea is private chatting in game. This has obvious uses.

Lastly one other idea would be a race based rank up system thta had minor benefits for example the reptiles when first bought would have a 5% spawn boost and a 2% defence boost and then would have 2 or 3 or maybe even 4 stages where as you played them they became more powerful all the way up to their traditional boost of 10% spawn boost and 5% defence boost or you could even have the boost at teh final stage be even greater than its traditional boost.

Just got another idea!! A directory that had something explaining the game. Not a tutorial but a info packet. Such as what all race boosts are such as legionaire 2% boost, and other such things. My final idea is a personal one to switch natives from their 1 being 2 thing to being a sort of defencive terminator so that if they had a smaller army they got maybe a 10% boost cause 15% might be a bit overpowering.

Just a suggestion. But I think it would be a good idea to put all your ideas on the forum titled "Feature Request". Just saying.

[Xtermy]

How does allowing people to vote on having alliances capable in a game
to clarify that means that when everybody is waiting for the game to fill before it begins besides the ready button and the race switcher they can choose another button labeled Diplomacy. If a majority votes to allow then the game will allow alliances and cease-fires and maybe even territory switching or if the majority vote against it then it will not be allowed in that game. Just another idea to make the game interesting, and can be used to make map specific to alliances and will bring in people who enjoy playing as a team with others, and can allow someone to be a "teacher" to a new player and ally with them so they can safely show them the ropes
Another idea is private chatting in game. This has obvious uses.

Lastly one other idea would be a race based rank up system thta had minor benefits for example the reptiles when first bought would have a 5% spawn boost and a 2% defence boost and then would have 2 or 3 or maybe even 4 stages where as you played them they became more powerful all the way up to their traditional boost of 10% spawn boost and 5% defence boost or you could even have the boost at teh final stage be even greater than its traditional boost.

Just got another idea!! A directory that had something explaining the game. Not a tutorial but a info packet. Such as what all race boosts are such as legionaire 2% boost, and other such things. My final idea is a personal one to switch natives from their 1 being 2 thing to being a sort of defencive terminator so that if they had a smaller army they got maybe a 10% boost cause 15% might be a bit overpowering.

Awesome ideas (especially the leveling-up of the different races), except for the fact that the Legionnaires race doesn't have any boosts (for now, at least).

Also, private chatting is already possible if you type another user's nickname exactly as it is written (and put it anywhere in a sentence).

[Ratburntro44]

I have to disagree with voting on having alliances. I don't want random people to hijack my game and put alliances in it. Game starter should decide that. How would you like it if a bunch of people came in and changed your game name, map, type, and distribution? This really isn't any different.

[BetaGen]

Also, private chatting is already possible if you type another user's nickname exactly as it is written (and put it anywhere in a sentence).

Wait what? How'd I miss that?

[Xtermy]

I have to disagree with voting on having alliances. I don't want random people to hijack my game and put alliances in it. Game starter should decide that. How would you like it if a bunch of people came in and changed your game name, map, type, and distribution? This really isn't any different.

I think that he indeed meant that only the lobby creator would be able to start a vote about whether to allow alliances or not (and he didn't, that is the only logical solution, or simply make this a setting of itself when creating the game lobby in the first place).

Also, even if the option to start a vote will be open to all players in the lobby, we are still only talking about alliances, not anything else that you mentioned (and as far as I know, even if the game creator leaves his\her lobby, and people are still in it, the next "lobby master" can't change anything, even the lobby's name).