I agree with ratburn. And no high, I am not rat.
Mods should be given more authority due to their few numbers.
Also, I only see this game getting popular. It might just be me, but the community where I come from has growing interest in this game.
Ratburntro44 wrote:necrocat219 wrote:Unfortunately the game is on it's way out, I don't think Lopdo would focus on making chat channels, although the rest of the ideas seem feasible.
The thing about games of this size is that there is a perfectly reasonable chance of it being in a stage of growth again 2 weeks from now.
I think the main thing that needs to be done with moderators is giving them the ability to ban someone without actually having to find them in-game.
P4n4c3a wrote:1.) What happens when the guests create the games?
P4n4c3a wrote:2.) It doesn't matter if they read it or not. By having the rules, they are bound by the because they read them. In addition mods follow those rules.
P4n4c3a wrote:5.) It seems you haven't noticed. Try joining the chat and look at the player in the top. Keep joining and you will see that it changes.
P4n4c3a wrote:In reality there are multiple lobbies. The private and clan channels are extra and I know they would require a lot of code. I would at least like the pub lobbies be available to choose from.
P4n4c3a wrote:1.) I'm not sure if you noticed but some of the game names are:
Karen is a pedophile
chess is a faggot
Karen is a rapist
And so on and so on...
P4n4c3a wrote:2.) There's not one single chat while you wait to join a game. There's at least 2. Possibly 3 lobbies.
Guest77 wrote:While I do agree guests should be a *bit* more limited, I do not agree that they shouldn't make games. I do think that, at most, they shouldn't be able to RENAME the game.
Ratburntro44 wrote:Guest77 wrote:While I do agree guests should be a *bit* more limited, I do not agree that they shouldn't make games. I do think that, at most, they shouldn't be able to RENAME the game.
This is a good idea.
calleharnemark wrote:Ratburntro44 wrote:Guest77 wrote:While I do agree guests should be a *bit* more limited, I do not agree that they shouldn't make games. I do think that, at most, they shouldn't be able to RENAME the game.
This is a good idea.
Good idea, but I would prefer if guests couldn't make games at all. Also then not change their guest names such as GuestWhateveroffensiveshit.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests