EFFACÉ
Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2012 8:02 pmEFFACÉ
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2012 8:02 pmRe: MINIMUM RATING
Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2012 8:57 pm+1
Re: MINIMUM RATING
Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2012 9:51 pmFor some reason, I thought I had suggested this but I looked at my posts and it looks like I haven't... lol, +1 to you Ozserf. I need better memory.
Re: MINIMUM RATING
Posted: Mon Aug 20, 2012 12:42 ammeh... rating doesn't always mean experience and/or skill. Seems pointless, just another filter.
Re: MINIMUM RATING
Posted: Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:38 amI still think it would make sense: we still keep observing people playing either double accounts, or 'secret alliances' and so. Now these 'teams' are almost always composed of 1 player with high rating (the one that benefits from this 'collaboration', be it with himself or others), and 1 or more accounts with pretty poor rating, yet absolutely necessary for the 'main' player to have advantage.
Now you can imagine if such a player can only join a game with his 'artificially boosted' account, but not with the 'assisting' ones, that will change A LOT
Now you can imagine if such a player can only join a game with his 'artificially boosted' account, but not with the 'assisting' ones, that will change A LOT
EFFACÉ
Posted: Mon Aug 20, 2012 4:29 pmEFFACÉ
Re: MINIMUM RATING
Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2012 9:16 amI would def add this to the filters.... higher rating people are more often serious players. and second spot hunters never get above 1700-1800.