EFFACÉ
31 posts
• Page 1 of 4 • 1, 2, 3, 4
Re: UPGRADE 3
by Drone6o3 » Fri Feb 10, 2012 9:07 pm
many do
See You In The Vortex,
My Level: 18
My Clan: http://vortexwars.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=1703
Best Creature Ideas: http://vortexwars.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=1643
My Level: 18
My Clan: http://vortexwars.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=1703
Best Creature Ideas: http://vortexwars.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=1643
-
Drone6o3 - Posts: 2358
- Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2012 5:45 am
- Location: The Great American Empire (The GÆ)
Re: UPGRADE 3
by Mexxor-Dinair » Sat Feb 11, 2012 1:55 am
It would be good on maps with over twohundred regions or more, but it would make it a good bit harder for new players to win a game
T|-|€ \/0®T€××
If anything in this post is (in)correct, don't blame me
I'm not new or old, just Mexxor
If anything in this post is (in)correct, don't blame me
I'm not new or old, just Mexxor
-
Mexxor-Dinair - Posts: 508
- Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2012 11:52 am
- Location: Somewhere Dutch
Re: UPGRADE 3
by Alaska456 » Sat Feb 25, 2012 4:56 pm
Upgrade #3- I like it. BUT...
People will have trouble placing 60 units in time. The human mind doesn't generally do well with more than 6-7 groups (40/7= 5.7). Raising the # to 60 would make it 7.2!
It's too much for most people to keep on top of. Stoners and small-minded-individuals will surely be revealed, as their units randomly place after time expires.
The dynamics of the changes to VW favor experienced players.
People will have trouble placing 60 units in time. The human mind doesn't generally do well with more than 6-7 groups (40/7= 5.7). Raising the # to 60 would make it 7.2!
It's too much for most people to keep on top of. Stoners and small-minded-individuals will surely be revealed, as their units randomly place after time expires.
The dynamics of the changes to VW favor experienced players.
- Alaska456
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2012 9:07 pm
Re: UPGRADE 3
by hunter102321 » Sat Feb 25, 2012 5:49 pm
I agree with Alaska i sometimes have trouble getting 40 units in the right places with 60 it would practically be random wherever it looks nice not strategic.
If I said something stupid above ^ don't worry thats normal. 
-
hunter102321 - Posts: 328
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 12:26 am
- Location: AFK in vortex wars lobby, seriously though go check
Re: UPGRADE 3
by Mexxor-Dinair » Sat Feb 25, 2012 6:15 pm
Alaska456 wrote:Upgrade #3- I like it. BUT...
People will have trouble placing 60 units in time. The human mind doesn't generally do well with more than 6-7 groups (40/7= 5.7). Raising the # to 60 would make it 7.2!
It's too much for most people to keep on top of. Stoners and small-minded-individuals will surely be revealed, as their units randomly place after time expires.
The dynamics of the changes to VW favor experienced players.
One thing: since Upgrade #1 and #2 both upgraded the troop capacity with 10, why would #3 do it with 20?
Also #3 would be only useful on maps wich are big enough to get 50 territories on, most likely a bit later in the game
i think people would be able to place 7 groups instead of 5-6, just one more... there is also "borders" and "random" placement where you don't have to do it yourself
i think #3 would just be as useful as the first 2 are
"The dynamics of the changes to VW favor experienced players"
Well, that will be no matter if the upgrade comes through or not..
Experienced players will always have the advantage of having played more games. thus having more experience with VW (not talking about lvl)
And the only way to become experienced is to play games, so what is your point here?
After some time everyone will be completely nice with the upgrade
P.S.: This is just my opinion, not trying to get down what you say
T|-|€ \/0®T€××
If anything in this post is (in)correct, don't blame me
I'm not new or old, just Mexxor
If anything in this post is (in)correct, don't blame me
I'm not new or old, just Mexxor
-
Mexxor-Dinair - Posts: 508
- Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2012 11:52 am
- Location: Somewhere Dutch
Re: UPGRADE 3
by Mexxor-Dinair » Sat Feb 25, 2012 6:17 pm
Ozserf wrote:Right, I prefer your opinion Mexxor-Dinair
T|-|€ \/0®T€××
If anything in this post is (in)correct, don't blame me
I'm not new or old, just Mexxor
If anything in this post is (in)correct, don't blame me
I'm not new or old, just Mexxor
-
Mexxor-Dinair - Posts: 508
- Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2012 11:52 am
- Location: Somewhere Dutch
31 posts
• Page 1 of 4 • 1, 2, 3, 4
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests