The Moonlight Café

[Autumnwolf17]

ONE MORE!!!.png (14.86 KiB) Viewed 3248 times

ONE MORE WIN AND I HAVE 1,000!

[Autumnwolf17]

I got my thousand.

Anyway, I use Ratburn's roll simulator to test how overpowered Ryan's trees really are. Statistically, with the shield and the lightning bonuses, 8v8, he wins over 9 out of every 10 battles. If the defender also has a shield, Ryan still wins over 70% of the time. With a 5% defence bonus (Reptiles and Angels), even with a shield, the percentage is still just below 70% in Ryan's favor.

Now, let's boost the defender's chances a little more. Let's say Ryan only has a 7 to fight the 8 with (and still uses both a shield and lightning) Assuming the defender is using a normal no bonus race, Ryan (or other tree users) will win 77% percent of the time if the defender doesn't have a shield, and about 55% with the shield. And just to add emphasis, Ryan can beat an 8 with a 6 about half the time.

Trees kill.

(And just in case you're curious, if he has an 8 and YOU have a 7, he wins 99% of the time)

[calleharnemark]

I got my thousand.

Anyway, I use Ratburn's roll simulator to test how overpowered Ryan's trees really are. Statistically, with the shield and the lightning bonuses, 8v8, he wins over 9 out of every 10 battles. If the defender also has a shield, Ryan still wins over 70% of the time. With a 5% defence bonus (Reptiles and Angels), even with a shield, the percentage is still just below 70% in Ryan's favor.

Now, let's boost the defender's chances a little more. Let's say Ryan only has a 7 to fight the 8 with (and still uses both a shield and lightning) Assuming the defender is using a normal no bonus race, Ryan (or other tree users) will win 77% percent of the time if the defender doesn't have a shield, and about 55% with the shield. And just to add emphasis, Ryan can beat an 8 with a 6 about half the time.

Trees kill.

(And just in case you're curious, if he has an 8 and YOU have a 7, he wins 99% of the time)

Could you make that with snowflakes? I wonder if someone could look up the actual statistics for snowflakes, because no defense or attack stats doesn't seem legit. If it would be it would mean race no race bonuses makes you OP against the one who disables them.

[Autumnwolf17]

I got my thousand.

Anyway, I use Ratburn's roll simulator to test how overpowered Ryan's trees really are. Statistically, with the shield and the lightning bonuses, 8v8, he wins over 9 out of every 10 battles. If the defender also has a shield, Ryan still wins over 70% of the time. With a 5% defence bonus (Reptiles and Angels), even with a shield, the percentage is still just below 70% in Ryan's favor.

Now, let's boost the defender's chances a little more. Let's say Ryan only has a 7 to fight the 8 with (and still uses both a shield and lightning) Assuming the defender is using a normal no bonus race, Ryan (or other tree users) will win 77% percent of the time if the defender doesn't have a shield, and about 55% with the shield. And just to add emphasis, Ryan can beat an 8 with a 6 about half the time.

Trees kill.

(And just in case you're curious, if he has an 8 and YOU have a 7, he wins 99% of the time)

Could you make that with snowflakes? I wonder if someone could look up the actual statistics for snowflakes, because no defense or attack stats doesn't seem legit. If it would be it would mean race no race bonuses makes you OP against the one who disables them.

It should even statistics if both have no bonuses at all.

[calleharnemark]

I got my thousand.

Anyway, I use Ratburn's roll simulator to test how overpowered Ryan's trees really are. Statistically, with the shield and the lightning bonuses, 8v8, he wins over 9 out of every 10 battles. If the defender also has a shield, Ryan still wins over 70% of the time. With a 5% defence bonus (Reptiles and Angels), even with a shield, the percentage is still just below 70% in Ryan's favor.

Now, let's boost the defender's chances a little more. Let's say Ryan only has a 7 to fight the 8 with (and still uses both a shield and lightning) Assuming the defender is using a normal no bonus race, Ryan (or other tree users) will win 77% percent of the time if the defender doesn't have a shield, and about 55% with the shield. And just to add emphasis, Ryan can beat an 8 with a 6 about half the time.

Trees kill.

(And just in case you're curious, if he has an 8 and YOU have a 7, he wins 99% of the time)

Could you make that with snowflakes? I wonder if someone could look up the actual statistics for snowflakes, because no defense or attack stats doesn't seem legit. If it would be it would mean race no race bonuses makes you OP against the one who disables them.

It should even statistics if both have no bonuses at all.

In that case, please check cuz the rolls is very unrealistic for a no bonus race. Ryan would probably have over 50 % chance to win without tannenbaums. I lose unusually many rolls compared to other races without stats.

[Autumnwolf17]

RyanLuck does exist, but it can't be measured very well. The site I'm using doesn't check the race itself, just statistics for attack and defense bonuses based off their numbers. And since the Snowflakes and the races they disable supposedly have no bonuses, I can't calculate it in any way but to just type in equal numbers. If it helps though. with completely even races (no bonuses), the defender has a slightly higher chance (about 53%) of winning because they still win when the numbers are even. But that's barely noticeable.

[calleharnemark]

RyanLuck does exist, but it can't be measured very well. The site I'm using doesn't check the race itself, just statistics for attack and defense bonuses based off their numbers. And since the Snowflakes and the races they disable supposedly have no bonuses, I can't calculate it in any way but to just type in equal numbers. If it helps though. with completely even races (no bonuses), the defender has a slightly higher chance (about 53%) of winning because they still win when the numbers are even. But that's barely noticeable.

Link, please?

[Autumnwolf17]

Follow the Wolf.

[Ryankill]

RyanLuck does exist, but it can't be measured very well. The site I'm using doesn't check the race itself, just statistics for attack and defense bonuses based off their numbers. And since the Snowflakes and the races they disable supposedly have no bonuses, I can't calculate it in any way but to just type in equal numbers. If it helps though. with completely even races (no bonuses), the defender has a slightly higher chance (about 53%) of winning because they still win when the numbers are even. But that's barely noticeable.

i know what wolf will say for lucky rolls, 3v8 wins, ryanluck, 8v3 loses, ryanluck, 4v8 wins, ryanluck, anything thats a bit lucky, the word is ryanluck

it will become a new the newest word in the english dictorany.

[Autumnwolf17]

Actually, I normally just would call it 'Trees'. If it isn't Trees, SoldierLuck is the more accurate term, but you're the leader of the soldiers, so you have the most SoldierLuck. Thus, RyanLuck.