Page 1 of 11

Conquer:Loss ratios

PostPosted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 5:26 am
by Chess435
On this thread, post how many territories you've conquered compared to the number you've lost., then do a little division. You'll end up with a Conquer:Loss ratio, which I believe to be a better indicator of player skill than games won/lost. (Check the details page for stats, you might need premium)

Ratio - Rating
0-0.3 Uber Noob
0.3-0.5 Noob
0.5-0.7 Needs Practice
0.7-0.9 Below Average
0.9-1.1 Average
1.1-1.3 Above Average
1.3-1.5 Skilled Player
1.5-1.7 Exceptional Player
1.7-2.0 Professional Player
2+ VW Legend


My personal stats: 1480 conquers, 1048 losses.
C/L ratio of 1.41

Re: Conquer:Loss ratios

PostPosted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 6:36 am
by techgump
I'm not a legend :(, but I feel like one.

C/L: 1.80
Win percentage: 43%
Typical Game Settings: Hardcore, Full Map, avg 7 players.

Re: Conquer:Loss ratios

PostPosted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 8:02 am
by Bounty42
overwhelming urge to shop results to show a negative number.

Also, wouldn't this be skewed by Full v. Conquor and Map size? What about quitting for stat boost: I conquer 32 then drop, loosing the game but none of my regions?

anyways, I'm running a 1.6 making me exceptional.
Stat block.png
Stat block.png (76.99 KiB) Viewed 9904 times

Re: Conquer:Loss ratios

PostPosted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 9:15 am
by 1N5AN3
Here is my stats. C/L is 1.67 i am Exceptional Player. ;)
Image

Re: Conquer:Loss ratios

PostPosted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 12:10 pm
by Norman Bates
I don't have a screenshot, but it is 9834 wins and 4625 losses, so I guess I am a Legend... If only I had better luck/patience, then my level would be way higher then it is right now(level 22).

Re: Conquer:Loss ratios

PostPosted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 1:12 pm
by Ratburntro44
I count as a "Skilled Player"...

Re: Conquer:Loss ratios

PostPosted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 3:00 pm
by klapzi
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/692/24649024.png/ (I need to be taught how to upload images)

I'm a legend, barely.

Edit: If you surrender it counts as if you lost the territories? If it doesn't one could be a "legend" by simply surrendering when he noticed he was going to lose

Re: Conquer:Loss ratios

PostPosted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 3:33 pm
by Chess435
Dang it, you guys (with the possible exception of Rat) are all better than me! :shock:

Re: Conquer:Loss ratios

PostPosted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 4:08 pm
by klapzi
lol i'm not a legend anymore

This is the unluckiest day ever

I have been last 8 times in a row(really, what are the mathematic chances of this happening?)

I have had territories invaded with half of my number of defenders(5 times)

I think I should stop playing for today.

Edit: 9 times in a row now

Edit2: I'm a legend again, but I had to appeal to 1v1 in the hourglass(I'm very good at it)

Re: Conquer:Loss ratios

PostPosted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 4:29 pm
by Chess435
klapzi wrote:lol i'm not a legend anymore

This is the unluckiest day ever

I have been last 8 times in a row(really, what are the mathematic chances of this happening?)

I have had territories invaded with half of my number of defenders(5 times)

I think I should stop playing for today.

Edit: 9 times in a row now

Edit2: I'm a legend again, but I had to appeal to 1v1 in the hourglass(I'm very good at it)



How many players were in each of your matches. Based on this, the probabilities could vary wildly.