Conquer:Loss ratios

[Darkas]

I want that soooo badly :D

Upgrade your day to 28hours, you'll have some more time to do it :P

[NicTyn]

According to you, I'm a freaken legend. Right...

[falco00]

region conquer: 14452
region lost: 5869

ratio: 2.46

so according to that i'm a legend?

[techgump]

UPDATE:

C/T (conquer/total owned): 64%
W/T (win/total played): 43%
7SWR (7 player standard win rate): 14%
DV (data variance): .05%

To provide in non % output:
C/L (conquer/loss) = 1.79
W/S (win/standard) = 3.07
DV (data variance) = .0005

The numbers have changed slightly. My data variance has decreased due to the number more of games I have played, which should solidify more the data results accuracy.
To note, a big problem with c/l data, is that users which quit without seeing out the game will naturally have a much higher c/l than those that see it though to last death of property. C/L hence is as much an indicator of a potentially good player as it is a quitter when they do not do well at start.

[Ratburntro44]

Techgump, hiding premium isn't very effective if you show us a picture of the hide premium button with your profile...

Lol

[techgump]

I don't really care. It just helps not be so stuck out like a sore thumb in games. It's bad enough that I am a target of group allies to kill the top dog.

[Munchy]

So..
6375/2386=2.67 meaning I am a legend.. I don't think so..but sure, lol.
And a win percentage of 51.1%. Still would hardly consider myself a legend.

[balderr]

Have a few comments on this topic:

1. You can't get a C/L-ratio of under 1, that would mean you lose every game and you play it until you are completely taken over.
2. If you play 2 player games, your C/L and your W/L ratios are higher than when you play 8 player games.
3. Techgump is less legend than me :p

[techgump]

The need for you to compare yourself to me is a statement in itself about my legendness

[Bladesam]

Haha, I definitely agree with gump lol