by highlander » Sat Sep 17, 2016 1:16 am
It now feels modship can grant you any ruling and anything you want without a screen shot, just a word from a mod can demand full perm-ban,even though he only had the job for a few months.
Since when can a mod excgarated about so called slanderous remarks ( no screen shoots of abuse ) ,old fashioned term sullied his name,'' WHERE '' ,since when refusing to play with a mod is sullying his name.
Also no mention of a certain player who stirred and baited ,also misleading the mod. In my concept of rules telling lies and misleading a mod is more a rule break.
Mods are here to guide the game from those who constantly are a harassment and rule breakers, but it seems making game names,kicked 60 times a week and constant harrassment are allowed ( just mods stamp them no violation ,until you answer a mod back,then its harassment ),just not allowed in the democratic nature to question a mod.
Its ok to say to a mod '' Go fu#k yourself FM, you motherfuker '' and get a one day ban.
But questioning a mod gets 60 days and a demand for full ban.
So Beaver please tell where this is justice, as I said before the rules need badly up-dated.
Scotland The Brave
Hint;Stop being abusive /bullying and you'll not be reported.