A message to Chess435

Posted:
Wed Jan 22, 2014 9:02 pm
by Ryan.S.Baker
What did you mean exactly by 'Enjoy your ban.' ?
Is this sarcasm or is this a sincere sentiment that you wish for me to feel pleasure from you banning my scumlander account?
Re: A message to Chess435

Posted:
Wed Jan 22, 2014 9:10 pm
by Autumnwolf17
Ryan.S.Baker wrote:What did you mean exactly by 'Enjoy your ban.' ?
Is this sarcasm or is this a sincere sentiment that you wish for me to feel pleasure from you banning my scumlander account?
Are you trying to annoy us, or are you genuinely this annoying in real life?
He means you've earned your ban, in case you actually can't tell.

Re: A message to Chess435

Posted:
Wed Jan 22, 2014 9:47 pm
by Ryan.S.Baker
Who is 'us' ?
I did not write this message for you and I did not write this message for anyone else but chess435. I do not know why you felt the need to reply to my message when I clearly wrote 'A message to Chess435'.
Re: A message to Chess435

Posted:
Wed Jan 22, 2014 10:07 pm
by Ryankill
Ryan.S.Baker wrote:Who is 'us' ?
I did not write this message for you and I did not write this message for anyone else but chess435. I do not know why you felt the need to reply to my message when I clearly wrote 'A message to Chess435'.
Well maybe chess has more important things to be doing, than going after assholes like you
Re: A message to Chess435

Posted:
Wed Jan 22, 2014 10:10 pm
by Fangfallen
Ryan.S.Baker wrote:Who is 'us' ?
I did not write this message for you and I did not write this message for anyone else but chess435. I do not know why you felt the need to reply to my message when I clearly wrote 'A message to Chess435'.
If it was a message to Chess435 you would have PM'd him.
You made this post just to be an ass.
Of course it was sarcasm.
Re: A message to Chess435

Posted:
Wed Jan 22, 2014 10:18 pm
by Autumnwolf17
Fangfallen wrote:Ryan.S.Baker wrote:Who is 'us' ?
I did not write this message for you and I did not write this message for anyone else but chess435. I do not know why you felt the need to reply to my message when I clearly wrote 'A message to Chess435'.
If it was a message to Chess435 you would have PM'd him.
You made this post just to be an ass.
Of course it was sarcasm.
That was literally what I was going to say. Almost word for word.
Re: A message to Chess435

Posted:
Wed Jan 22, 2014 10:48 pm
by Aurora Australis
Ryan.S.Baker wrote:What did you mean exactly by 'Enjoy your ban.' ?
Well don't you enjoy the thrill of being banned? I for one assumed you do.
Oh and +1 to what Fang & Ryankill wrote.
Re: A message to Chess435

Posted:
Wed Jan 22, 2014 10:51 pm
by highlander
Aurora Australis wrote:Ryan.S.Baker wrote:What did you mean exactly by 'Enjoy your ban.' ?
Well don't you enjoy the thrill of being banned? I for one assumed you do.
Oh and +1 to what Fang & Ryankill wrote.
Oh there allowed to post asshole to a noob but you stick your nose in and make a thread of hate if i do it.
Re: A message to Chess435

Posted:
Wed Jan 22, 2014 10:52 pm
by Fangfallen
As a matter of fact, Ryan.S.Baker, your entire original message would have been take much more seriously if you had PM'd it to a moderator in the first place. Alas, you decided to make an ass of yourself by doing it publicly.
Nope, I'm not taking Highlander's side, I agree that he can be out of line oftentimes, but you went too far.
You disabled the validity of your point by stooping down to a lower level by making that publicly and with your inaptly named account.
Re: A message to Chess435

Posted:
Wed Jan 22, 2014 10:54 pm
by Fangfallen
highlander wrote:Aurora Australis wrote:Ryan.S.Baker wrote:What did you mean exactly by 'Enjoy your ban.' ?
Well don't you enjoy the thrill of being banned? I for one assumed you do.
Oh and +1 to what Fang & Ryankill wrote.
Oh there allowed to post asshole to a noob but you stick your nose in and make a thread of hate if i do it.
Well, where I'm from ass = donkey and the donkey is considered a foolish animal.. so it isn't really considered cussing.