Page 1 of 2
CAMPAIGN WARS

Posted:
Sat Mar 09, 2013 5:31 am
by jwl1000
this was a bad idea, and im sorry. if you are reading this for the first time, please disregard. thanks for your time
-JWL1000
Re: CAMPAIGN WARS

Posted:
Sat Mar 09, 2013 9:45 am
by highlander
Against , this game was designed for a single warrior to stand alone,not cowardly allies.Clan wars are a seperate issue and should remain so,i'd like to see more clan conflicts but not in general game.Vortex-wars is based on the board game RISK,in which you stood alone no allies.This idea is more a bullying tactic and would put off a good number of players.Also as a bullying tactic the mods will come down heavy on it and the result would be more bans.
Re: CAMPAIGN WARS

Posted:
Sat Mar 09, 2013 3:18 pm
by Autumnwolf17
Well, here's my thing.
I really don't want to make the clans look like the only option for new players, that would mean making the game worse for almost everyone who isn't on forums. Mind you, I believe that the Clans do have a way of enhancing the game for most people, simply because of the comparative organization. On the forums, clans have proven to be the best way to organize battles and all. It's been a while since any good fights among clans, but I know that the WolfPack has organized a lot amongst ourselves. As we are currently the largest, and the most forum active (to the point of annoying some others of you, I think), I imagine we would be able to help by organizing more inter-clan activity.
However, I have no intention of forcing Clans to be the main focus of the game. That, in a way, is the wrong thing to do. We can make ourselves look good, sure, but the WolfPack at least will not be forcing ourselves upon everyone else.
For me, the Clans are much more of a social gathering than an in-game force, especially at the moment. If Clans were added by Lopdo, I could see a good bit of campaigning happening, but as long as they are not...
This isn't to say, however, that I am against the idea completely. We are willing to work with you guys if you can give me a better idea of what exactly would be happening (besides the attacks on individuals, which won't happen)
Re: CAMPAIGN WARS

Posted:
Sat Mar 09, 2013 3:28 pm
by Autumnwolf17
Status, as far as I can see:
WolfPack: Might be part of some of this, but not the force
Warrior's Creed: Other than you, seems not to have made a decision
Renegades: Against
Angels: Funnyman is the only Angel even on the forums, really, so probably not the most viable choice
Soldiers: Also pretty much just the leader, though he is also with Wolves
Four Riders: I doubt they would be the best choice, given that most new members wouldn't be accepted
Re: CAMPAIGN WARS

Posted:
Sat Mar 09, 2013 5:15 pm
by johnnyboy
hey just because i don't post a ton doesn't mean im not here
Re: CAMPAIGN WARS

Posted:
Sat Mar 09, 2013 5:31 pm
by >(FM)<
Yes, I see my members on.. rarley though only ones i know of that get on regularly is Tacodude, tKick and johnnyboy.
Re: CAMPAIGN WARS

Posted:
Sat Mar 09, 2013 11:32 pm
by Vortex_Master
The clans here are different, they are all unofficial and not everyone knows about them so you cannot compare them to Alliances in games such as Envoy with official Alliances and rules. Plus in those games, the Alliances bully people not in theirs. Clan Wars happen when arguments spark (usually). I prefer "friendly matches" if there is no hatred. Because we (Warrior's Creed) have gone through this "active, in-active" thing we do not have the numbers we used to. We have enough to fight a war, but I feel that there is no need for one at this moment. It is not the right time for the Creed to start another war, and I wish you had consulted with the Council about your idea before spamming this (no offense). I oppose to war until I have sorted out all the inactive members and get all the offensive teams in order.
Re: CAMPAIGN WARS

Posted:
Sun Mar 10, 2013 12:14 am
by Ryankill
Autumnwolf17 wrote:Status, as far as I can see:
WolfPack: Might be part of some of this, but not the force
Warrior's Creed: Other than you, seems not to have made a decision
Renegades: Against
Angels: Funnyman is the only Angel even on the forums, really, so probably not the most viable choice
Soldiers: Also pretty much just the leader, though he is also with Wolves
Four Riders: I doubt they would be the best choice, given that most new members wouldn't be accepted
A lot of my members are on the forum, 8-9 visit it on a daily bases as guest and dont borther to log unless they really need to
Re: CAMPAIGN WARS

Posted:
Sun Mar 10, 2013 10:46 pm
by jwl1000
alright. i see my idea was quite a bit bold. i was rash and tired at the time. It was late, no one was on, and i was agitated by the inactivity. i realize my mistakes now. i'm sorry if i made anyone else annoyed, however, i would like to see some more action between clans
Re: CAMPAIGN WARS

Posted:
Sun Mar 10, 2013 11:38 pm
by Ryankill
jwl1000 wrote:alright. i see my idea was quite a bit bold. i was rash and tired at the time. It was late, no one was on, and i was agitated by the inactivity. i realize my mistakes now. i'm sorry if i made anyone else annoyed, however, i would like to see some more action between clans
Dont worry, there will be a lot of wars soon.