What race is the best is the best for each game stile

[KAI5AH]

so i think what would be the best race for aggressors on XXL maps i think ( i talk about ATT )

or natives because we ( aggressors ) have many "one's" when because we take alot of enemy and when about 60 one's become 2 is pretty nice + att begining it's hard to retake the grounds you took i say at beginning when its a about 9-13 territorys
it when you start the first 8 fights so natives are realy good for aggressors too

on the other side Arachnids --- the + 5 % att isn't very big from 20 + roll its only + 1 which is pretty small . and the 10 % spaw whell as you get sopply maxed and it happens fast the 10 % spaw is nulled

so the big question WHAT RACE IS BETTER FOR AGGRESSORS NATIVES OR ARACHNIDS and why most aggressors play them (ARACHNIDS when the natives bonuses seem to be much better from beginning game to end )

i would like to know + you can ask about more game stiles here ....

[BeatlesFan]

If you are the aggressor you are attacking.

Natives are better for defending - not attacking - so between the two - Arachnids are the better choice.

I would prefer Undead in your question - since you get 2 chances to attack on one hit - more of an aggressor than one strike.

[Xtermy]

If you are the aggressor you are attacking.

Natives are better for defending - not attacking - so between the two - Arachnids are the better choice.

I would prefer Undead in your question - since you get 2 chances to attack on one hit - more of an aggressor than one strike.

Yep, pretty much. Only thing is the Undead are best in Hardcore mode, IMO.

[KAI5AH]

If you are the aggressor you are attacking.

Natives are better for defending - not attacking - so between the two - Arachnids are the better choice.

I would prefer Undead in your question - since you get 2 chances to attack on one hit - more of an aggressor than one strike.

you think if i am a aggressor i never would be attacked myself and when you are attacked you better to be hard to take ... don't you think so ... and the + 5 % att of Arachnids isn't so good bonus ... the + 10 % spaw maybe but as soon as you'r sopply maxed ...

[Tensegravz]

If you are the aggressor you are attacking.

Natives are better for defending - not attacking - so between the two - Arachnids are the better choice.

I would prefer Undead in your question - since you get 2 chances to attack on one hit - more of an aggressor than one strike.

he asked for ALL STYLE.....so without BOOST game mode...Undead suck Brooo WAKE UP !!! HAHA

[Ozserf]

EFFACÉ

[tonyy4]

it's better to have more defense than more attack
told by a high ranking player
reptiles

[KAI5AH]

it's better to have more defense than more attack
told by a high ranking player
reptiles

in that point of view the NATIVES are better

[tonyy4]

natives are not better, reptiles are better because not only they have 5% defense they have 10% spawn
how many high ranking players do u see playing natives?
so far i've seen the majority play reptiles, if not dragons

[Xtermy]

natives are not better, reptiles are better because not only they have 5% defense they have 10% spawn
how many high ranking players do u see playing natives?
so far i've seen the majority play reptiles, if not dragons

I disagree - many high-ranking players use the Natives and many prefer the attack based races as well.

Anyway, whether it's attack or defense, a %5 bonus is indeed not much at all (and there are a few old thread where the same high-ranking players have discussed it and came to this very conclusion).