Vortex Wars

I found something interesting out on the net today.. or maybe not, but ppl are trying their best...

look at this.!!
http://www.memoryhacking.com/forums/vie ... =26&t=9386

Don't worry. Amount of shards you posses it stored server-side. And as long as you don't have direct access to its memory/database (which is never) you can't use programs like CheatEngine or so to modify that value. Ofc you can change this value in your client and it will look like if you had more shards but it will not give you any good as all purchase checks are server-based.

Ok, if you say so. I´m just mad because people always tries to get advantages bad ways you know...why not just enjoy the game for what it is and be fine with that!

magves wrote:Ok, if you say so. I´m just mad because people always tries to get advantages bad ways you know...why not just enjoy the game for what it is and be fine with that!

Trust me, I fully understand what you feel as I cheat myself in games for over 8 years We may be on two different sides of the barricade but still. That has grown to rank of Art now. I just like to find weak points to be abused. I tend to inform game authorities about my findings and if they don't seem to care about then I feel free to abuse whatever I can But the most satisfying is when authors try to fight with cheaters and you keep cheating and being undetectable for years in the same game I know it from my own experience.

you little rat!!!

damn, I tried to register to their forum so I could reply to that poor soul, but I wasn't able to get past their captcha I knew it will have to come one day and it did, captchas got so complicated even humans can't read them, good job

write: hack vortexwars online and u will have more then that one

magves wrote:you little rat!!!

Was that an insult?

Ratburntro44 wrote:

magves wrote:you little rat!!!

Was that an insult?

Remember Rat, you're just a mouse pretending to be a rat... so don't feel bad.

Misterniceguy is actually his vortex wars account. Lopdo, should i enforce action to this ?

*referring to the threatening to hack ruling*