Ratburntro44 wrote:Your logic is a complete fail. The quantity of posts does not imply that my posts are useless; try to think before posting a reply to this.
Awesome400 wrote:Ratburntro44 wrote:Your logic is a complete fail. The quantity of posts does not imply that my posts are useless; try to think before posting a reply to this.
I've seen you post over 50% of your post and 100% of the post I saw were useless. Thus, proving my point.
Ratburntro44 wrote:Awesome400 wrote:Ratburntro44 wrote:Your logic is a complete fail. The quantity of posts does not imply that my posts are useless; try to think before posting a reply to this.
I've seen you post over 50% of your post and 100% of the post I saw were useless. Thus, proving my point.
Let's get some other people to voice in on this.
Ratburntro44 wrote:I know my anger may have gotten out of hand with the new update, as people here may know, I can be very mercurial, and go into fits of rage when I get angry. I am sorry for that
Noahsarc13 wrote:It takes a lot for someone to admit they are wrong.
Awesome400 wrote:It takes even more to go online about it.
Ratburntro44 wrote:I have multiple ideas to present to you here:
-More servers. Not really a feature, but I hate being locked out of the game.
-Realistic casualties. When you lose a battle, the casualties on the other side should be a bit more more realistic, same for casualties on you when you win a battle.
-A way to move troops that currently are trapped behind your own troops.
-A mode where units are still distributed to level 8 tiles, just it doesn't actually add anything. This makes it more strategic so that giant draws don't happen at the end of the game.
-A way to reward people who give you ideas that you use
BetaGen wrote:Lets take your first "conversation" (posting in the same forum for the 1st time) as a judge of usefulness and maturityRatburntro44 wrote:I know my anger may have gotten out of hand with the new update, as people here may know, I can be very mercurial, and go into fits of rage when I get angry. I am sorry for thatNoahsarc13 wrote:It takes a lot for someone to admit they are wrong.Awesome400 wrote:It takes even more to go online about it.
Rat 1 Awesome 0
Lets say it's not fair and we should take a look at Rat's 1st post aswell:Ratburntro44 wrote:I have multiple ideas to present to you here:
-More servers. Not really a feature, but I hate being locked out of the game.
-Realistic casualties. When you lose a battle, the casualties on the other side should be a bit more more realistic, same for casualties on you when you win a battle.
-A way to move troops that currently are trapped behind your own troops.
-A mode where units are still distributed to level 8 tiles, just it doesn't actually add anything. This makes it more strategic so that giant draws don't happen at the end of the game.
-A way to reward people who give you ideas that you use
Rat 2 Awesome 0
Also you if you compare what forum did they both post in most in the beggining you can see that:
Rat: Mostly feature requests (about 4 pages of only it) with useful ideas, discussions
Awesome400: Some opinions, lots of chit chat, 1st of.... ∞ saying you are awesome
Rat 3 Awesome 0
Finally, when you click on a member you can see what he's focused on mostly...
Rat:
Most active forum: Feature requests
(520 Posts / 26.16% of user’s posts)
Awesome:
Most active forum: Forum games
(412 Posts / 31.60% of user’s posts)
Rat 4 Awesome 0
This is arbitrary counting so chill the f out
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests