Page 4 of 11
Re: Conquer:Loss ratios
![Post Post](./styles/prosilver/imageset/icon_post_target.gif)
Posted:
Tue Oct 25, 2011 10:10 pm
by Santa367
are u kidding, guys???
ive got 1,74 but in my winning games i let my last enemy conquer my lands so that i can take them back and have more xp and shrards... if i wouldnt do it id have like 2,3 or more... but i dont feel me the pro player...(i ususally play 8 men games on big maps)
Re: Conquer:Loss ratios
![Post Post](./styles/prosilver/imageset/icon_post_target.gif)
Posted:
Wed Oct 26, 2011 9:30 pm
by Chess435
Santa367 wrote:are u kidding, guys???
ive got 1,74 but in my winning games i let my last enemy conquer my lands so that i can take them back and have more xp and shrards... if i wouldnt do it id have like 2,3 or more... but i dont feel me the pro player...(i ususally play 8 men games on big maps)
Considering stuff like this, I may readjust the ratios for each rating.
Re: Conquer:Loss ratios
![Post Post](./styles/prosilver/imageset/icon_post_target.gif)
Posted:
Thu Oct 27, 2011 5:19 am
by techgump
I don't think you can adjust for it. As not everyone does it. It just goes to show that C/L alone is as unreliable as wins.
Re: Conquer:Loss ratios
![Post Post](./styles/prosilver/imageset/icon_post_target.gif)
Posted:
Thu Oct 27, 2011 6:57 pm
by Mossant26
i dont got a screen shot but my stats r 4923 conqured and 2011 lost = 2.44 conquer/loss ratio and 60 wins in 321 games played = 19% win rate
![Razz :P](./images/smilies/icon_razz.gif)
and lvl 16
Re: Conquer:Loss ratios
![Post Post](./styles/prosilver/imageset/icon_post_target.gif)
Posted:
Sat Oct 29, 2011 12:34 am
by srmanofwar
played: 188
won: 85
captured: 5107
lost: 2441
45% won
2.09:1 is my captured to lost ratio
![Cool 8-)](./images/smilies/icon_cool.gif)
Re: Conquer:Loss ratios
![Post Post](./styles/prosilver/imageset/icon_post_target.gif)
Posted:
Wed Nov 02, 2011 9:30 am
by Jokern
My is 1.78
conquered: 4562
lost: 2607
Re: Conquer:Loss ratios
![Post Post](./styles/prosilver/imageset/icon_post_target.gif)
Posted:
Wed Nov 02, 2011 10:11 pm
by BetaGen
![Image](http://img573.imageshack.us/img573/7607/screenshot20111102at110.png)
Win rate 40%
Conquer/Loss rate 1.74
Don't really think I'm pro dude...
![Uber Geek :ugeek:](./images/smilies/icon_e_ugeek.gif)
Re: Conquer:Loss ratios
![Post Post](./styles/prosilver/imageset/icon_post_target.gif)
Posted:
Thu Nov 03, 2011 12:22 am
by srmanofwar
I'm now up to 47.5% wins
conquers still about 2.08:1
Re: Conquer:Loss ratios
![Post Post](./styles/prosilver/imageset/icon_post_target.gif)
Posted:
Thu Nov 03, 2011 9:08 am
by adude159753
Maybe if there was a split in statistics for conquered territories and lost territories and game types you may be able to standardize ranking or levels based on Conquer:Loss ratios. Of course you would need some complicated formula to make the conquered regions in conquer game types worth less. I had at one point about a 4:1 ratio because I played primarily conquer. Then once I switched my ratio has dropped but it is still about 2.6:1. Obviously I'm not as good as the players who play almost all full map though my ratio tells different. I don't think I deserve the highest title. I would think I fall somewhere in the middle. Maybe like a 1.5:1 ratio?
Re: Conquer:Loss ratios
![Post Post](./styles/prosilver/imageset/icon_post_target.gif)
Posted:
Sat Nov 05, 2011 6:18 am
by BelgarionRiva
The conquer/loss ratios are biased and the win/loss ratio are also biased to judge your "rank" as a player. Could the root of the variance multiplied by the difference of the average of the other players be used in order to determine rank?