Report Users

[techgump]

I agree... take em down.

[Xtermy]

What I meant was when some has like 18-22 territories, and there is only 1 border. The other person may have 100+ territories, and that person has played well and actually won the game.

The guy with 15-22 territories had just turtled in his fortress all game.

That IMO is not a draw, and the one guy with fewer territories should quit.

... Just my opinion though.

Totally agree with you on this one - the player with the lower amount of territories should surrender after a considerable amount of a stalemate (considerable, however, is indeed open to personal interpretation).

I do agree that such situations can bog down to who has more spare time on their hands, and that can indeed be very frustrating.

[highlander]

Totally agree with you on this one - the player with the lower amount of territories should surrender after a considerable amount of a stalemate (considerable, however, is indeed open to personal interpretation).

I do agree that such situations can bog down to who has more spare time on their hands, and that can indeed be very frustrating.[/quote]

Most of the older players who do play with honour do surrender and there's no shame just a good game.

[Xtermy]

Most of the older players who do play with honour do surrender and there's no shame just a good game.

Yep, that's great and I'd wish everyone would act like that.

[calleharnemark]

Most of the older players who do play with honour do surrender and there's no shame just a good game.

Yep, that's great and I'd wish everyone would act like that.

If you truly respect the other player, do not surrender. This should be a game of skill, not an endurance test.

[highlander]

Most of the older players who do play with honour do surrender and there's no shame just a good game.

Yep, that's great and I'd wish everyone would act like that.

If you truly respect the other player, do not surrender. This should be a game of skill, not an endurance test.

I respect all players but defeat is deafeat , why carry on for two hours.Just saying when a game has ended its climax its over why prolong it.

[Autumnwolf17]

Yep, that's great and I'd wish everyone would act like that.

If you truly respect the other player, do not surrender. This should be a game of skill, not an endurance test.

I respect all players but defeat is deafeat , why carry on for two hours.Just saying when a game has ended its climax its over why prolong it.

I play until the end, unless there is a significant stalemate, in which case I surrender (unless they're ahead by like two regions)

[canag0d]

Most of the older players who do play with honour do surrender and there's no shame just a good game.

Yep, that's great and I'd wish everyone would act like that.

If you truly respect the other player, do not surrender. This should be a game of skill, not an endurance test.

That is exactly the point we are making. At this stage in the game it is not about skill, or luck, just who has more time/a better connection.

Your message is kind of contradicting itself

[Xtermy]

Most of the older players who do play with honour do surrender and there's no shame just a good game.

Yep, that's great and I'd wish everyone would act like that.

If you truly respect the other player, do not surrender. This should be a game of skill, not an endurance test.

Not trying to be an ass, but isn't your message a bit of a contradiction?

Anyway, I hate surrendering as well (and rarely do), so I always prefer the other guy (or gal) to surrender first.

[Joshua]

Mlodynurek and Mamontyonok may or may not be secret allies/the same person.

I had them on my ban list and forgot to report them, so they might not play anymore and I have no screenshots. Just check them out, please?