Fangfallen wrote:If somebody wanted, could they vote say, BF for leader AND Coleader? So as to make sure that you are in some position?
Fangfallen wrote:If somebody wanted, could they vote say, BF for leader AND Coleader? So as to make sure that you are in some position?
royalblue wrote:Fangfallen wrote:If somebody wanted, could they vote say, BF for leader AND Coleader? So as to make sure that you are in some position?
It's essentially just first and second choice. If you vote Leader, they get more points, and Coleader gets fewer points. So if the Leader votes were scattered, a constant second choice could win. The only flaw is that once you see who the Leader is going to be because it's public, you can then vote for the person you want to be Coleader as Leader and then the fourth person as Coleader. But that would still get the results of the population in a way.
And on that, I vote BF for both, but FM can be third-in-command.
Autumnwolf17 wrote:Why did you quote him in red?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests